LSARS LSARS
Illustration: human review with checklist

For litigation and mass‑tort teams

Triage at scale, surface the best cases first, and produce evidence packs that withstand expert and regulatory review.

Explainable AI Stronger filings Secure document flows

The problems we solve

Backlog at intake

Volume spikes overwhelm reviewers; strong cases wait too long.

Inconsistent analysis

Different reviewers draw different conclusions from similar facts.

Evidence gaps

Finding and organizing supporting literature and records is tedious.

What you get

  • • Faster triage so strong cases move first
  • • Fewer hours per file—lower review costs
  • • Clear reasoning you can put in front of experts and courts
  • • Consistency across reviewers at volume
  • • Happier clients with predictable updates

Outcome

Faster case movement, stronger filings, and happier teams and clients.

See an example

Example summary (plain language)

Finding

This file is likely viable based on medical history and exposure timeline.

Why we think so

  • Records show diagnosis consistent with exposure‑linked patterns.
  • Timeline ties symptoms to documented exposure periods.
  • Two peer‑reviewed studies report similar findings.

Sources we checked

  • Exposure and condition risk in worker cohorts (2016)
  • Clinical review of exposure‑related diagnoses (2019)
  • Guidance on documenting occupational exposure (2021)

What happens next

Assign to reviewer for quick confirmation and generate the initial evidence pack.

This example shows the tone and structure of our summaries. It is not medical or legal advice.